15 Comments

Magnetic fields and apoptosis: a possible mechanism - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15368378.2022.2073547?journalCode=iebm20

(paywalled You know the way..)

The potential therapeutic uses of electromagnetic fields (EMF), part of the nonionizing radiation spectrum, increase with time. Among them, those considering the potential antitumor effects exerted by the Magnetic Fields (MFs), part of the EMF entity, have gained more and more interest. A recent review on this subject reports the MFs’ effect on apoptosis of tumor cells as one of the most important breakthroughs. Apoptosis is considered a key mechanism regulating the genetic stability of cells and as such is considered of fundamental importance in cancer initiation and development. According to an atomic/sub-atomic analysis, based on quantum physics, of the complexity of biological life and the role played by oxygen and its radicals in cancer biology, a possible biophysical mechanism is described. The mechanism considers the influence of MFs on apoptosis through an effect on electron spin that is able to increase reactive oxygen species (ROS) concentration. Impacting on the delicate balance between ROS production and ROS elimination in tumor cells is considered a promising cancer therapy, affecting different biological processes, such as apoptosis and metastasis. An analysis in the literature, which allows correlation between MFs exposure characteristics and their influence on apoptosis and ROS concentration, supports the validity of the mechanism.

Comments on Magnetic Fields & Cells - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIL5vfIGg_Q

Expand full comment

What happens if you REMOVE a cell tower on a building in Japan.. Significant Decrease of Clinical Symptoms after Mobile Phone Base Station Removal – An Intervention Study -> https://mdsafetech.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/shinjyo-t-and-shinjyo-a.-2014-significant-decrease-of-clinical-symptoms-after-mobile-phone-base-station-removal-e28093an-intervention-study.-.pdf

Expand full comment

Effect of Low Frequency (50Hz) Electromagnetic Field on Germination

Process of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) -> https://www.saspublishers.com/media/articles/SAJB_114_147-158_FT.pdf

There are many such reports. Check out http://microwavenews.com for a huge list.

Expand full comment

Military Expert in radiowaves and health (radar, 3/4/5G, Wifi, etc). During his military career, Barrie Trower encountered radar and radio related health problems and the top-secret military research to harm and influence people. He continued research at the University and gave some lectures.

Links to interview:

https://www.youtube.com/@iciclaw

https://rumble.com/c/c-2316350

https://odysee.com/@ICIC:3

He explains how certain frequencies damage (or influence) certain parts of the body, via the electric or magnetic field of the wave.Mitochondrial DNA is often affected and can cause cancer and fertility.

All problems are all ignored on purpose, and probably used for military or intelligence operations.

Some frequencies seem to have weird psychological effects, like drugs.

The regulators and tech-industry pushed fake safety standards based on damage via heating during only 6 minutes.

Expand full comment

I suggest looking in to Dr. Martin Pall work.

https://www.wirelesseducationaction.org/dr-martin-pall/

Dr. Martin Pall, Ph.D.: Electromagnetic Field Exposure - The Cellular Effect on Humans https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8ATQF8omdI

Expand full comment

1. "any freq can be ionizing"

I'm not sure your example shows that. Looks like it's the heat of the arc that does that, not the EM.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_arc#Overview

Also, a sparc gap transmitter does not emit only EM at its nominal frequency but has an extremely wide bandwidth, it's all over the spectrum, which is why they were banned as soon as better circuits were available.

As an side anecdote of something I can't reference to - an aquaintaince told me of research ~ in the 1990s which some US professor conducted and, at the time, published openly, about rather (ultra) low frequency, and even very low field strength EM producing certain patterns, to drag the brain waves onto it and thus alter the state, such that e.g. deep tranquility was induced.

At that time that acquaintance was into experimenting with "esoteric circuits" and trying whether anything was to them.

He had downloaded all the info from that prof, shortly before he was sacked by the military to apparently work for them exclusively on that stuff and sealed, so that information disappeared quickly.

But he still had it, and claims to has successfully replicated that, testing it on himself and relatives, reproducing the effects.

I haven't been given a demonstration and don't know whether he still has that gear from decades ago, but it sounds interesting ;)

He also told me about fractal antennae and analogs in animals.

Expand full comment

> in the 1990s which some US professor conducted and, at the time, published openly, about rather (ultra) low frequency, and even very low field strength EM producing certain patterns, to drag the brain waves onto it and thus alter the state, such that e.g. deep tranquility was induced.

Also in 1990s Popular Science, the US military had a working prototype of a weapon which induced fear and panic in people it was pointed at. This is direct mood manipulation. It was an attempt at non-lethal crowd control.

Expand full comment

Well that just put me off my nightly cocktail with Coca Cola... But sincere thanks for the education about EMF fields. Much appreciated.

Expand full comment

Great article.

Expand full comment

> The evidence for "magnetic skin vaccines" is very bad.

Yes some of the videos are faked. But graphene can be made paramagnetic. I had never heard this term until 2022. More information: https://wordsalad.info/tag-graphene.html

Expand full comment

By the way. Thanks for the long list.

Expand full comment

You need ferromagnetism and a lot of substance to get some magnetic effects. But most people do not understand magnetism at all. In the many hyped videos I have NOT seen any people test for magnetism, but for adhesive skin instead.

Magnetism can be tested by using different materials. One material will stick better than the other. You can always put some paper or plastic in between. And you can get the exact location with a compass. Or with a magnet going around the location, if it is not a magnet but ferromagnetic. This works on distance and does not need to touch the skin.

Adhesive skin can be tested with sticking small object onto the skin. A metal works better due to the flat surface. And it sticks a bit to moisture due to the dielectric force (vanderwaals force).

I also saw many videos with people showing blue-tooth or WIFI connections in a group of people. Most of these people wear mobile-phones, smart watches, and there are smart lights, and security cameras. Maybe some pace-makers also have buetooth connection https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sZ7BXh0pAg

RFID is a different beast. And the known technology is still very visible.

Expand full comment

Has anyone proved that the mRNA in the shots is even viable? Are the LNPs + PEG causing all the inflammation? Aggressive cancers? Clotting? Is it just making people ticking time bombs? I'm fine with the idea of there not being any *reduced* graphene oxide, but I am not fine with settling on it being just contamination.

Expand full comment