One thing though. Mathematically, infinite isn’t the same as continuous. As far as we have evidence, the physical world isn’t continuous from the mathematical perspective. Which means that Schrödinger’s model can at best match reality under a restricted domain. In truth, it’s probably got error that’s written off as tolerable noise. Any mathematical model that relies on the continuum will have the same issue.
More importantly to me, and why I really appreciate this article, is the recognition that measuring is an interaction, and that it is nontrivial information in the system. It’s too often under appreciated.
Under research: Light also has a momentum, a pushing force. It is very weak and some experimental demonstrations of it have been false, so there is some confusion around it. Note that a push can be achieved with magnetic induction. So the pushing force might be caused by the electron-shell reacting to the alternating magnetic field.
You posit that the photon does not exist and light is only a wave? But, what about the electron? Does it exist as a discrete particle? Most would say yes because we can measure that lump of matter in various ways. Electrons have been fired one at a time through the double slit and observed to produce an interference pattern, suggesting it also has a wave-like nature. Sometimes the particle description is more appropriate and other times the wave description is better suited. What is the truth as to what the electron is? Maybe it is just a wave and only a wave. But it's very strange to me how a spread out wave can collapse to a single dot on a piece a photo film.
BTW, thanks for making me think. I enjoyed reading your article.
We can clearly falsify the photons. But we still have to research electrons and other "particles. Are they a superfluid like the mercury video?
Photons (Bosons) clearly have no structure. While electrons, protons and neutrons (fermions) have some kind of structure. And thresholds. I think that there are thresholds on different levels.
I have a hypothesis that there is something like 2 spaces of aether, where one is connected with another via a 3D/4D vortex. It would look like a vortex that we see in superconducting material. But in 3D instead of 2D. Example of superconducting material vortices https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_ZgiumS41Q Example 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxVqO5zPmvU
These vortices are not actual particles in the video. Just magnetic fields related to electric charge forming ring-currents at certain places. But they behave exactly like particles. So my hypothesis is that the electrons were some kind of vortex to begin with, but of a higher dimension.
I'd like to have a discussion of this stuff, SciAnalyst & others. Are you available? I started a forum where it might be handy to discuss at https://substack.webboard.org/cosmology-f3.html
I came to the exact same conclusion, devised almost the exact same experiment as you did, after I tried analysing the quantum eraser experiment from the viewpoint of classic wave theory. And I am not even a physicist or good in math.
If all electromagnetic waves are photons, then how big are the supposed photons that are called "schumann resonance"? Seriously, what were those scientists smoking?
Heroin and amphetamine was still a popular "medicine" at those times.
Personally, I had a lot of electromagnetism on university. So I always tried to understand what a photon really is. There was no evidence for a photon, except for Einstein's model of the photo-electric effect. Which is already an interpretation. Photons do not work with anything else related to electromagnetic waves. It also over-complicate things. And how can even a constant electric field exist? Or a constant magnetic field?
And after Eric Reiter's experiment with high energy photons, it was clear that Einstein's model was 100% falsified.
The Schumann resonance is something else. It is the electromagnetic echo that goes around the Earth. Usually detectable with lightning, but you can also generate it yourself with low frequency radio.
I follow "see the pattern" too. He is very good and tries to give an unbiased breakdown. His video is more about the Quantum Electrodynamics (QED). And how they just fucked up everything. My article focuses on one step before that. The measurement problem and the easy solution that works.
I like this article.
One thing though. Mathematically, infinite isn’t the same as continuous. As far as we have evidence, the physical world isn’t continuous from the mathematical perspective. Which means that Schrödinger’s model can at best match reality under a restricted domain. In truth, it’s probably got error that’s written off as tolerable noise. Any mathematical model that relies on the continuum will have the same issue.
More importantly to me, and why I really appreciate this article, is the recognition that measuring is an interaction, and that it is nontrivial information in the system. It’s too often under appreciated.
Fun experiment: The Phase Conjugate Mirror
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAy39ErqV34
Seems like protons are like the mercury-droplet in the article, Can I add this as a confirmation?
Protons may be stretchier than physicists had thought. The quarks making up these particles seem to move more than they should in an electric field - https://www.snexplores.org/article/proton-stretch-strong-force-particle-physics-quark
Under research: Light also has a momentum, a pushing force. It is very weak and some experimental demonstrations of it have been false, so there is some confusion around it. Note that a push can be achieved with magnetic induction. So the pushing force might be caused by the electron-shell reacting to the alternating magnetic field.
Update.
This video explains it best. Why light has momentum even without mass? -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvzr2HbbPC8
You posit that the photon does not exist and light is only a wave? But, what about the electron? Does it exist as a discrete particle? Most would say yes because we can measure that lump of matter in various ways. Electrons have been fired one at a time through the double slit and observed to produce an interference pattern, suggesting it also has a wave-like nature. Sometimes the particle description is more appropriate and other times the wave description is better suited. What is the truth as to what the electron is? Maybe it is just a wave and only a wave. But it's very strange to me how a spread out wave can collapse to a single dot on a piece a photo film.
BTW, thanks for making me think. I enjoyed reading your article.
We can clearly falsify the photons. But we still have to research electrons and other "particles. Are they a superfluid like the mercury video?
Photons (Bosons) clearly have no structure. While electrons, protons and neutrons (fermions) have some kind of structure. And thresholds. I think that there are thresholds on different levels.
I have a hypothesis that there is something like 2 spaces of aether, where one is connected with another via a 3D/4D vortex. It would look like a vortex that we see in superconducting material. But in 3D instead of 2D. Example of superconducting material vortices https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_ZgiumS41Q Example 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxVqO5zPmvU
These vortices are not actual particles in the video. Just magnetic fields related to electric charge forming ring-currents at certain places. But they behave exactly like particles. So my hypothesis is that the electrons were some kind of vortex to begin with, but of a higher dimension.
I'd like to have a discussion of this stuff, SciAnalyst & others. Are you available? I started a forum where it might be handy to discuss at https://substack.webboard.org/cosmology-f3.html
ll check it out.
https://odysee.com/@StopTheCrime:d/Breaking-News-SHOCKING---Here-is-What-Really-is-in-the-Vaccines:d
-----
Thank you for allowing me to run the guest post and hanging out for discussion, SA.
Not for content, but what are your thoughts on this video, IF you are interested in watching.
If wrong, is it within "Plausibly wrong" or...."making shit up" wrong?
Thank you for exposing the phony photon!
I came to the exact same conclusion, devised almost the exact same experiment as you did, after I tried analysing the quantum eraser experiment from the viewpoint of classic wave theory. And I am not even a physicist or good in math.
If all electromagnetic waves are photons, then how big are the supposed photons that are called "schumann resonance"? Seriously, what were those scientists smoking?
Heroin and amphetamine was still a popular "medicine" at those times.
Personally, I had a lot of electromagnetism on university. So I always tried to understand what a photon really is. There was no evidence for a photon, except for Einstein's model of the photo-electric effect. Which is already an interpretation. Photons do not work with anything else related to electromagnetic waves. It also over-complicate things. And how can even a constant electric field exist? Or a constant magnetic field?
And after Eric Reiter's experiment with high energy photons, it was clear that Einstein's model was 100% falsified.
The Schumann resonance is something else. It is the electromagnetic echo that goes around the Earth. Usually detectable with lightning, but you can also generate it yourself with low frequency radio.
I think that authoritarian thinking has caused stagnation in science and in society.
Even art has become bananas.
I follow "see the pattern" too. He is very good and tries to give an unbiased breakdown. His video is more about the Quantum Electrodynamics (QED). And how they just fucked up everything. My article focuses on one step before that. The measurement problem and the easy solution that works.