It is still not visible and still looks like another massive mistake. It is based on theories based on theories based on hypotheses based on assumptions which have not been proven. At first glance it looks like the reflection of a plasma-beam. It is funny how Becky uses a reflection/diffraction of a glass as an example of an Einstein ring. Hint hint.
The enthusiasm comes from the number games that seem to produce some results. It is full of bias and fiction, but because of the complicated maths involved no-one notices. Just like astrology seems correct due to all the interesting calculations.
Becky also thinks that Einstein's gravity is valid, and I would love an explanation why charged objects do not experience induction force in gravity. I think that progress comes from checking the boundaries instead of doing the same thing over and over again.
The LIGO is based on light-interference, between large mirrors and fresnel lenses. Each small vibration is amplified to the extreme. So it is extremely sensitive to sound. Especially with the mirrors resembling a gong, capable of making lots of different vibrations. Any sound will be converted to "signal" with different frequencies and different patterns. So it is an extremely hard problem.
No-where in the LIGO documentation I saw people dealing with the problem of sounds. Any sound is amplified to the extreme. Heat can cause all kinds of sounds. Also electronics and lasers can all kinds of sound. The heating and cooling of the pipes and ground can cause sounds. Birds and planes cause sounds, which will have an effect if they resonate.
Because the sound are converted via interference, a weak sound can change into a high frequency pattern with a changing frequency.
Good science starts with the assumption that the hypothesis is false, and tries to find other explanations before making any conclusions. The LIGO project demonstrates how bad astronomy is at doing any good science.
Book comes to the same conclusion about the LIGO detector - "Unchallenged Priveledge: The Billion Dollar Trilateral Gravitational Wave Discovery Scam" Bibhas De
Dr Becky with another video about "black holes". The closest KNOWN black holes to Earth (only three have ever held the title) -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xLiw9yJu1k
Because an object is invisible in visible light, they speculate that there is a "black hole". Which is a belief, not science. The X-ray light can easily come from solar flares, like the x-rays from our own sun. The astronomers still have no clue why the Sun produces x-rays, so why can they even be correct with invisible objects far outside our solar system?
In the beginning the scientists were still agreeing that this was a speculation, but the later scientists just believed the hype. This video shows how this belief slowly grows into a religion.
I was an astrophysics major briefly as an undergrad. This is in the early 90s. I did not pursue it. Much of it did seem like we might as well have been talking about the tooth fairy. It was all heading in such a beyond theoretical direction - really just human minds making stories about stuff they did not understand.
Just another claim of a "massive" black hole, that makes Dr Becky exciting.Video Dr Becky -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aativXKru1M
It is still not visible and still looks like another massive mistake. It is based on theories based on theories based on hypotheses based on assumptions which have not been proven. At first glance it looks like the reflection of a plasma-beam. It is funny how Becky uses a reflection/diffraction of a glass as an example of an Einstein ring. Hint hint.
The enthusiasm comes from the number games that seem to produce some results. It is full of bias and fiction, but because of the complicated maths involved no-one notices. Just like astrology seems correct due to all the interesting calculations.
Becky also thinks that Einstein's gravity is valid, and I would love an explanation why charged objects do not experience induction force in gravity. I think that progress comes from checking the boundaries instead of doing the same thing over and over again.
Additional problem with LIGO.
The LIGO is based on light-interference, between large mirrors and fresnel lenses. Each small vibration is amplified to the extreme. So it is extremely sensitive to sound. Especially with the mirrors resembling a gong, capable of making lots of different vibrations. Any sound will be converted to "signal" with different frequencies and different patterns. So it is an extremely hard problem.
Here is "The interferometer guitar Pedal" that using the sound principle to create sound effects. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mI_TRSHnbo
No-where in the LIGO documentation I saw people dealing with the problem of sounds. Any sound is amplified to the extreme. Heat can cause all kinds of sounds. Also electronics and lasers can all kinds of sound. The heating and cooling of the pipes and ground can cause sounds. Birds and planes cause sounds, which will have an effect if they resonate.
Because the sound are converted via interference, a weak sound can change into a high frequency pattern with a changing frequency.
Good science starts with the assumption that the hypothesis is false, and tries to find other explanations before making any conclusions. The LIGO project demonstrates how bad astronomy is at doing any good science.
Book comes to the same conclusion about the LIGO detector - "Unchallenged Priveledge: The Billion Dollar Trilateral Gravitational Wave Discovery Scam" Bibhas De
Dr Becky with another video about "black holes". The closest KNOWN black holes to Earth (only three have ever held the title) -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xLiw9yJu1k
Because an object is invisible in visible light, they speculate that there is a "black hole". Which is a belief, not science. The X-ray light can easily come from solar flares, like the x-rays from our own sun. The astronomers still have no clue why the Sun produces x-rays, so why can they even be correct with invisible objects far outside our solar system?
In the beginning the scientists were still agreeing that this was a speculation, but the later scientists just believed the hype. This video shows how this belief slowly grows into a religion.
Then I tried biology and field ecology. More grounded. But too much chemistry for my taste.
I was an astrophysics major briefly as an undergrad. This is in the early 90s. I did not pursue it. Much of it did seem like we might as well have been talking about the tooth fairy. It was all heading in such a beyond theoretical direction - really just human minds making stories about stuff they did not understand.
You are so good, brother. Thank you. Please write and post much more often here on substack than you do!