Global Warming Science
The mainstream takes it from where the sun does not shine
THE GLOBAL WARMING NARRATIVE
Narrative level 1) The climate science is settled.
This is a total lie, as different climate models are still being developed. This does not only mean changing parameters, complicated dynamics, but also different factors.
Climate Models for the Layman with Dr. Judith Curry
The funny thing is that the ones that work best, are those that do not use CO2 in their models (Russian model).
Newer models are still being developed that also include the sun's activity
These Milankovitch Cycles (and more) are factors that influence the temperature.
So the models are showing the opposite of what the narrative is telling us.
But what this narrative did is horrible:
It blocked all valid criticism.
And this turned most of the climate science into bullshit.
Because now the scientists had to maintain the myth. So they keep claiming that that their models were settled and that all data is showing it.
To maintain the myth, the first frauds were showing soon. (first climate gate).
Narrative level 2) How can science be wrong?
a) Lie 1 - There is a huge majority that supports the narrative.
This is also a lie. The majority was fabricated by the technocracy who selected a small group of climate scientists that had papers with this result.
Maybe they did it, because they were concerned.
b) Lie 2 - Specialists / experts in climate science know best.
Similarly: All specialists in astrology confirm that astrology works.
Explanation: specialists in an area often create a group-think that confirms a positive belief in their topic.
Specialists also use the same tool and same logic over and over again.
Even if the circumstances or data change.
So specialists in such a fixed state, will likely produce errors.
Narrative level 3) The earth is getting warmer. The data is correct.
I found out that this is not true at all:
THERE IS NO GLOBAL WARMING!
a) The data was often cherry-picked and manipulated.
b) Of different measurements of the same area the hottest were selected.
c) Gaps in the data were filled in with hot spots.
d) Cold spots were turned into hot spots.
e) Historical data was changed.
Fun fact: Vikings grew barley in Greenland
f) False measurements that showed extreme heat were used.
- measurements thermometers from hot sunny roofs,
- falling winds from mountains causing natural sudden temperature rises
g) The maps in the media and the maps published by NASA are continuously different.
h) water absorbs about 99% of the heat in the atmosphere, That means that CO2, NH4 (methane) can be neglected in the global temperature.
Hot water releases CO2, that is why historical records have some correlation between temperature and CO2. The causation is inverted.
Instead of gradual warming up, the climate is following the sun's cycles as a clock.
With the latest satellite data we also see other related myths disappear:
a) The sea-level is not rising.
NASA scientist explains with extreme accurate satellite data YouTube
The sea is clearly not rising. Also when we measure it via very accurate satellites.
What we see are some cities sinking due to heavy buildings standing on a moving ground.
b) Sea ice is not shrinking.
Narrative level 4) We only have a few years left.
With a few degrees warmer, the temperature will run out of control!
Well.. No.
Even the IPCC who started it is now denying this myth YouTube
Any physical system is usually stabilizing. The earth has already been hotter than today and cooled down, so it is stable towards a nice temperature.
The scientists studying the run-away model, found that there were some huge mathematical errors in it.
The idea of a run-away temperature comes from a bad and old model of the planet Venus. Venus is hot and has a lot of CO2 in the atmosphere, and the old idea is that this may work the same for Earth. That is why 100 years ago scientists started to worry about this happening.
On earth water is the most dominant greenhouse gas. So it works completely different, even if Venus is hot due to CO2.
Climate Sensitivity to CO2 is -0.02 Degrees Celsius YouTube
There is no Climate Emergency - signed by 500 scientists - pdf
Narrative level 5) Many natural factors don't matter.
a. Clouds
Yes clouds are neutral in the climate model. Yet we can see that clouds have a lot of influence to our weather. They can keep us warm or keep us cold. The hottest days are usually with a thin layer of clouds. And clouds in the night keep the night warm. But think layers of clouds can reflect the sun, and make days very cold.
Rain and snow also transport the cold in the higher atmosphere down to the surface. This can lower the surface temperature in degrees per minutes.
b. Sun
Yes, the climate scientists ignore the sun.
It is even worse: When the sun produces the most energy, the dominant climate model sees its influence as cooling. That is because the sun has slightly less ultraviolet light. But evidence shows that the total electromagnetic energy is much stronger at those times.
See Climate Forcing YouTube
c. Volcanoes
Volcanic activity can melt ice in arctic regions. And at those times panic breaks out under climate alarmists. That is because the models do not incorporate the volcanic activity. Even though Iceland and a lot of regions have hot water springs.
When a volcano spews smoke, the smoke can block a lot of the sun. With huge outbursts this can change the climate dramatically and cool the whole earth a few degrees. Yet, this is also not included in the model.
d. Jet-streams and ocean streams.
Jet streams dominate our weather completely. If the Jet stream comes from the arctic, the land gets the arctic temperatures. This can be very cold (yeti-stream) in the winter, or moderate in the summer. Note: the northern regions can become moderately warm due to continuous sunshine.
The same is when wind comes from the Sahara or other hot regions. The air becomes desert hot.
The hot and dry summer days in Europe were dominated by a jetstream directly from the Sahara. And the cold spring and wet summer in the US were dominated by the jetstream from the north. That is how simple it works.
The weather models look a bit at the jetstreams, but for some reason they are ignored when talking about the climate.
Additionally we have ocean streams that also transport heat and cold from other regions. They are more stable, but change a lot too.
The narrative climate model tries to model the ocean streams, but there is still a lot of discussion around it.
Note: the jet streams change clearly with the sun's activity.
Narrative Level 6) Human factors that don't matter:
a) Buildings - Ever been in a city during summer?
b) Airplanes - On 9/11 plane-traffic was grounded. This was also the most sunny day on Earth.
This clearly means that cloud-cover is increased by airplane traffic. The cloudforming and pollution depends on jet-engine and the height of flight.
c) Deforestation -
The narrative model sees forests are seen as heating, because they have a lot of surface.
But have you ever been in a forest in summer? It is cool.
That is because the biochemical processes absorb this heat and turn it into wood and food.
The result is that governments are now cutting away healthy forests.
They use the wood to generate electricity, and this is called CO2 neutral.
Neutral my ass!
d) Agriculture -
Bare land, or fields of grain or wet rice fields are very different. They can have a huge influence on the temperature.
Above houses and above grain fields you can easily find hot spots of air.
Both deforestation and local agriculture can cause dramatic erosion.
e) Factories, power plants
Ever been in an industrial area with lots of heavy industry?
What about a continuous smoke in the area?
Or the cooling of a nuclear plant or the cooling of a cloud service.
f) Climate control, air-conditioning
Besides your own building's air-conditioning and heating there is climate control on greater levels.
There are experiments with cloud seeding, cloud removal, and even cooling of the air. The extend of this is under discussion, and most of it is secret.
g) Industrial accidents
They happen from time to time and regularly create environmental disasters.
h) The military
Even during peace-time there is a lot of pollution. From the machinery, transports, the weapons and the soldiers.
Narrative level 7) The CO2 is more dangerous than:
a) pesticides.
b) red tide.
c) smog / pollution.
d) nuclear waste.
e) acid rain.
f) oil slicks, fracking and cleaning.
g) water vapour.
h) fishing
i) hunting.
Narrative level 8) There are also many other bad side-effects to CO2.
See - Exposing Junk Climate Science
a) Acidity of ocean.
The acidity seems related to acid rain due to pollution, and due to agriculture.
The "bleaching of the coral" is caused by the age of the coral.
According to a specialist, they die after a certain age.
b) Hurricanes / Extreme weather.
As I stated above. The extreme weather is related to solar activity.
That is because the solar flares, which are 10-100 times bigger than earth, sometimes reach the earth itself.
c) Starving Ice-bears.
The polar bear hoax - Corbett report
Narrative 9) The west produces the most CO2.
Oh wait it is china and the third world.
(heavy industry)
QUESTIONABLE SOLUTIONS
If you still believe in CO2 being bad.. the technocratic organisations, push non-working solutions. I will keep it short..
CO2-credit, which allows big corps to continue regardless
Raise taxes
Nuclear energy.
Cut trees for energy.
Remove plastic straws
Stop eating meat
Geoengineering
The effect is that the real producers of CO2 will continue, while everyone else must suffer.
So, these solutions don't work!
Solutions that may work are solar and wind energy.
But they are very limited: no big industry can survive with solar and wind.
SOLUTIONS THAT ARE NOT TALKED ABOUT
IF CO2 is a problem, These solutions may actually work!
Plant trees.
Stop wars.
Reduce pentagon budget.
Stop or reduce pumping of oil, stop fracking.
Reduce space missions.
Reduce industry.
Reduce transport.
More organic style agriculture / permaculture.
THE BIG MYTH - THERE IS NO AGENDA
The CO2 narrative even got supported by big investors, including oil-companies.
They clearly wanted a piece of the pie, whatever that pie is.
Main agenda goals:
1 - the control of all energy.
2 - the establishment of a world currency linked to energy (and CO2).
3 - the establishment of a (corrupt) world government for resources.
4 - Eugenics
How and why Big Oil conquered the world.
Corbett report - general discussion
A Century Of Climate Crisis YouTube
SOURCES
1000frollyPhD
Scientists (from NASA) talking about climate.
SuspiciousObservers
Science and climate news and some documentaries.
Check out the climate forcing documentaries
Corbett Report on climate
Goes into each part of the climate science.
Related article on ZeroHedge:
Global Warming Fraud Exposed In Pictures
http://www.realclimatescience.org
The site often explains with clear evidence, how the climate people rewrite history to fit to their own believes. The site lists clear scientific frauds by just a few climate scientists.
Goes into https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1585-5
This happens often. A drama is claimed by scientists, but this does not pass review after publication. But we never see the past-publication reviews.
Take the climate quiz (with references)
Quick overview
The Sun versus CO2..
Who will win?
We are in the lowest CO2 levels since Earth’s history. A bit lower and all trees and plants will die.
Climate on Greenland was warmer a lot of times -> https://odysee.com/@IvorCummins:f/the-best-climate-clip-i've-ever-seen:7
Wow that’s an incredibly comprehensive list of the climate science circus. The frustrating aspect, despite the evidence, is that brainwashed people, once they believe something, are so resistant to letting go of their beliefs and will reject any evidence to the contrary. Hopefully seeds will be planted in those minds (if they’re willing to read!)